Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Journal Affects on Child and Family Functioning

Res Dev Disabil. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 Jul 31.

Published earlier final editing as:

PMCID: PMC7392794

NIHMSID: NIHMS1555291

Self-Care in Caregivers of Children with FASD: How do caregivers treat themselves, and what are the benefits and obstacles for doing so?

Abstract

Background

Caregivers of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) have elevated levels of stress, which tin negatively impact family functioning and caregivers' mental and physical health. Self-care is a disquisitional resource to address caregivers' stress.

Aims

This written report describes strategies and obstacles related to self-care reported past caregivers of children with FASD. It as well examines how caregivers' perceived confidence in and frequency of self-care is related to stress, parenting attitudes, and family needs.

Methods & Procedures

Forty-half-dozen caregivers of children with FASD identified self-care strategies and obstacles and rated their conviction and frequency of self-care. Additional measures of perceived parenting efficacy, stress, family needs, child beliefs, and family demographics were administered. Correlation analyses examined associations betwixt self-care and measures of child and family functioning.

Results

Self-care strategies and obstacles were varied. Greater reported conviction in self-care was associated with less parental distress and more than satisfaction in the parenting role. Frequency of cocky-intendance was positively associated with confidence in self-intendance merely not with any other measure of family functioning.

Conclusions

Caregivers use a diverseness of strategies and face significant obstacles in self-care. Conviction in cocky-intendance may be associated with lower stress and greater satisfaction in the parenting function.

Keywords: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, prenatal alcohol exposure, fetal booze syndrome, self-intendance, stress, parenting

1. Introduction

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) represent a range of neurological and physical symptoms associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) and affect approximately 2–5% of children in the U.s. (May et al., 2018). An evaluation for FASD includes assessment of prenatal alcohol exposure, feature facial features, growth deficiency, scarce brain growth, and neurobehavioral damage; the specific FASD diagnosis rendered depends on the constellation of symptoms nowadays (come across Figure one; Hoyme et al., 2016). It is important to recognize that neurobehavioral impairment is the i consequent symptom beyond the main FASD diagnoses and has the nearly significant impact on everyday performance. Although the criteria for fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) have largely remained consistent since it was starting time recognized in the United states of america in 1973 (Jones & Smith, 1973), characterization of other conditions on the spectrum and refinement of criterion cutoffs continue to evolve to maximize sensitivity and specificity (Warren, Hewitt, & Thomas, 2011).

Diagnostic categories under the nomenclature of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) according to Hoyme et al., 2016.

Children diagnosed with FASD have many diverse and unique strengths (Chocolate-brown, Rodger, George, St Arnault, & Sintzel, 2008; Olson, Oti, Gelo, & Beck, 2009), but also tin can face up lifelong cerebral and behavioral impairments, every bit well as high rates of mental health disorders and other life problems (Streissguth et al., 2004). Caregivers of children with FASD face numerous organization barriers, lack of awareness and resources, and other obstacles in raising their children (Olson et al., 2009; Petrenko, Tahir, Mahoney, & Chin, 2014). These barriers contribute to high levels of stress in caregivers of children with FASD, despite the many protective actions these caregivers accept to support their children (Petrenko, Alto, Hart, Freeze, & Cole, 2019).

Although caregivers report important rewards, research has documented high levels of stress related to parenting a child with a disability (Smith, Oliver, & Innocenti, 2001; Baker et al. 2003; Paley, O'Connor, Kogan, & Findlay, 2005; Webster, Majnemer, Platt, & Shevell, 2008; Bobbitt et al., 2016). Research suggests parenting children with FASD may be especially stressful. Olson et al. (2009) establish that in a report of 52 primary caregivers of children with prenatal alcohol exposure, 92% reported clinically elevated child-related stress (Olson et al., 2009). Caregivers of children with FASD may even experience more stress than those of children with other developmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD; Watson, Coons, & Hayes, 2011). This is especially notable equally ASD has consistently been associated with high caregiver stress (Dumas, Wolf, Fisman, & Culligan, 2009; Estes et al., 2009). Specifically, ane study establish that caregivers of children with FASD reported significantly higher levels of stress than did caregivers of children with ASD (Watson, Coons, & Hayes, 2011). Although both groups identified stressors in qualitative interviews relating to the diagnostic process, dealing with behavioral issues, and the need for advancement, the nature of these stressors was unlike between groups (Watson, Hayes, Coons, & Radford-Paz, 2013). Specifically, the ASD diagnostic process oft involved doctors minimizing parents' concerns and long waitlists to see multiple providers, whereas the FASD diagnostic procedure required traveling long distances to find a knowledgeable provider and challenges verifying maternal drinking and getting a diagnosis when facial features were absent-minded. In terms of behavioral issues, parents of children with ASD emphasized stressful behavioral issues such as temper tantrums and rigidity. In contrast, parents of children with FASD were especially worried about how current behaviors might possibly lead to incarceration or other secondary conditions in the futurity. Although both groups described the need for advocacy, the FASD group reported having to educate teachers and providers about the status, which was not the case for ASD (Watson et al., 2013). Finally, early family stress can lead to difficulty in children's aligning later on in life (Abidin, 1992). Taken together, these studies underscore the importance of finding stress management techniques for this population, specially given the high level of stress in families of children with FASD (Olson et al., 2009) and the negative affect of stress on children'due south adjustment and functioning (Abidin, 1992).

Inquiry supports a transactional human relationship betwixt parent stress and child problem behavior; parental stress contributes to child behavior issues which in turn contribute to parental stress (Bakery et al., 2003). Studies take shown a clear association between increased problem beliefs in young children and loftier child-focused parental stress for both mothers and fathers (Creasey & Jarvis, 1994; Myers & Taylor, 1998; Smith et al., 2001; Paley et al., 2005; Paley, O'Connor, Frankel, & Marquardt, 2006; Jirikowic, Olson, & Astley, 2012). This relationship has been shown to be moderated by maternal social support and mediated by caregivers' cognitive appraisal of the responsibilities of caregiving (Found & Sanders, 2007). Additionally, parental stress tin can have ripple effects into boyhood, especially in adjustment and peer relations (Conger, Patterson, & Ge, 1995).

Parental stress has been shown to take an effect on attitudes effectually the parenting role. Parents who are more stressed tend to have feelings of decreased parental efficacy, decreased confidence in parenting, and lower satisfaction in the parenting role (McBride, 1989; Hassall, Rose, & McDonald, 2005; Ngai & Chan, 2012; Renner, Whitney, & Easton, 2015). Evidence is mixed on the association between parental satisfaction and kid problem behavior. Some studies evidence that parental role satisfaction is not linked with increased child problem behavior (Colina & Rose, 2009). Yet, some other studies show that as children'due south problem behaviors increase, parental role satisfaction decreases (Johnston & Mash, 1989; Gilmore & Cuskelly, 2012). In sum, stress affects how parents retrieve about their role as a parent, especially how confident and satisfied they experience near parenting. Child problem beliefs may too affect parental satisfaction.

Stress reduction is important for all parents. But stress reduction interventions may be especially critical in caregivers of children with special needs given their documented high stress levels. Some stress-reduction interventions, such as behavioral parent grooming and coping skills education, have shown promise in reducing stress in parents of children with developmental disabilities (Singer, Ethridge, & Aldana, 2007; Lindo, Kliemann, Combes, & Frank, 2016). Interventions that combine these two methods are highly effective in stress reduction (Singer et al., 2007), indicating these types of interventions may have an additive effect when conducted together. Recently, mindfulness interventions have also been shown to significantly reduce stress in parents of children with developmental delay (Neece, 2014; Bazzano et al., 2015). Though standard services such as respite care and example management may slightly reduce stress, targeted stress-reduction interventions accept a larger effect on parental stress-reduction (meet Hastings & Beck, 2004 for a review).

Although the caregiving brunt of a child with a disability and the negative effects of stress on parental behavior and parental part satisfaction have been established, little enquiry has been conducted on how caregivers treat themselves. Styles of coping used by parents of children with disabilities have been explored, including active-abstention coping, problem-focused coping, positive coping, and religious/denial coping (Hastings et al., 2005). However, few studies have investigated what specific strategies parents use to cope. Social support has been commonly reported as a coping strategy for parents (Beresford, 1994; Heaman, 1995; Jones & Passey, 2005). College social support has been associated with college satisfaction in parenting, higher family and parental well-beingness, and lower stress. Parent social support has been found to predict parent stress meliorate than child operation (Smith et al., 2001). Some take proposed a model in which social support mediates the effect of parent stress on parent well-being, family functioning, and even kid outcomes (Armstrong, Birnie-Lefcovitch, & Ungar, 2005). Other coping strategies may include practise or meditation (Hansmann, Hug, & Seeland, 2007; Neece, 2014; Bazzano et al., 2015), only take not been well studied in parents of children with developmental disabilities.

Cocky-care is a critical resource for non but caregivers' own physical and mental health but as well for the do good of their children. Equally discussed above, limited inquiry has been done on parents' self-intendance strategies, and of that no enquiry has examined specific cocky-intendance strategies in caregivers of children with FASD. The current written report aimed to elucidate how caregivers of children with FASD feel about their ain self-care, what they do for cocky-intendance, and obstacles they may face in doing and so. An boosted goal was to identify how measures of self-care were associated with indicators of family functioning, including caregiver stress, satisfaction in the parenting role, and child behavior. Results from this written report could inform intervention development for stress reduction in families raising children with FASD.

two. Methods

ii.one. Participants

Forty-six caregivers (ages 31–65) of children with FASD participated in this study. Participants were originally recruited as part of two dissever intervention trials investigating family-focused interventions for FASD. Intervention trial 1 was a pocket-sized-scale pilot randomized controlled trial of a multi-component intervention. Trial 2 was a community replication trial of a parent consultation program. For both trials, study information was shared with local providers and agencies serving children with FASD and within family back up groups and conferences. Interested families then contacted the enquiry squad. At the time of screening, families reported they were primarily referred by local clinicians. To exist included in analyses for the electric current study, participants had to accept a child with a diagnosis of an FASD or confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) between the ages of iii and 12. Diagnosis was determined equally part of the intervention trials and/or based on review of records from prior FASD evaluations. Further participant characteristics can be institute in Tabular array one.

Table 1.

Participant demographics.

Demographic Variable	Value
Caregiver Age Mean (SD)	45.78 (eight.00)
Caregiver Biological Sex Frequency (%)
Female person	41 (89.i)
Caregiver Race/Ethnicity (non-exclusive categories) Frequency (%)
Caucasian/White	41 (89.one)
African American/Blackness	5 (ten.nine)
Hispanic/Latino	i (ii.2)
Native American	iii (half dozen.v)
Other	1 (ii.2)
Caregiver Type Frequency (%)
Biological parent	1 (two.2)
Relative of child	7 (15.ii)
Adoptive parent	32 (69.5)
Non-relative foster intendance	half dozen (13.0)
Caregiver Marital Status Frequency (%)
Single, never married	3 (half-dozen.5)
Separated/divorced	8 (17.4)
Married or living with partner	34 (73.9)
Not reported	1 (2.ii)
Caregiver Educational Attainment Frequency (%)
High school diploma or less	7 (fifteen.2)
Some higher or Acquaintance's degree	13 (28.3)
Bachelor'due south caste	11 (23.9)
Primary's caste or higher	13 (28.3)
Not reported	2 (4.3)
Annual Family Income Frequency (%)
Less than 35,000	four (8.7)
35,000–49,999	5 (ten.9)
fifty,000–74,999	9 (20.0)
75,000–99,999	14 (thirty.iv)
More than than 100,000	12 (26.i)
Not reported	2 (4.three)
Child Age Mean (SD)	six.21 (1.59)
Child Age Range	three.0–eight.8
Child Biological Sex Frequency (%)
Female	13 (28.3)
FAS/pFAS Diagnosis Frequency (%)	20 (43.five)
ARND Frequency (%)	26 (56.five)
Child Other Conditions Frequency (%) as reported by parents
Attention Arrears Hyperactivity Disorder	37 (80.4)
Behavioral or Emotional Problems	40 (87.0)
Learning Problems	30 (65.ii)
Speech or Language Problems	24 (52.2)
Mental Retardation/Developmental Delay	xx (43.five)
Physical Inability, Orthopedic or Neurological Problem	17 (37.0)

2.2. Procedures

The Academy Institutional Review Lath reviewed and canonical all study procedures and informed consent was obtained from all participants. At baseline research visits (prior to intervention), participants completed interviews and questionnaires. Research visits for 31 participants (intervention trial i) were completed in the laboratory. Participants from intervention trial two (n=15) completed questionnaires in their home.

2.3. Measures

2.3.i. Cocky Intendance Cess (SCA)

Caregivers completed a self-written report measure out of various aspects of appointment in self-care developed for this study. The measure consisted of four items assessing conviction in taking care of oneself, identification of self-care strategies, frequency of self-care, and identification of obstacles or barriers to utilizing cocky-care strategies. First, participants were asked to rate their ability/confidence in maintaining self-care on a v-indicate scale ranging from "none" to "a groovy deal", with higher scores indicating higher confidence in self-care abilities. Next, participants were asked to listing the peak v self-intendance strategies they engaged in the most often. Participants and so reported on the frequency of their use of self-intendance strategies on an 8-bespeak calibration ranging from "rarely (less than once a calendar month)" to "multiple times per day", once again with higher scores indicating a college frequency of cocky-intendance. Finally, participants were asked to list the top 5 obstacles which got in the fashion of utilizing self-care strategies.

2.3.2. Family Needs Met Questionnaire (FNM)

The Family unit Needs Met Questionnaire (Olson et al., 2009) is based on a mensurate developed for traumatic brain injury (Kreutzer, Marwitz, & W, 1988). The measure includes items relating to mutual needs of parents and caregivers of children with alcohol-related disabilities and assesses the degree to which caregivers perceive these needs have been met. Each need is rated on a 4-indicate scale (1=non at all met, 4=a great deal met). The total score reflects the average response across items. Internal consistency in the electric current sample was high (α=.94).

ii.3.three. Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)

The ECBI (Eyberg & Pincus, 1999) is a rating scale measuring conduct problems in children ages 2 through xvi. The ECBI consists of 36 items that are each rated on a vii-point Intensity scale to bespeak the frequency of the beliefs, likewise as a Yes-No Problem scale to betoken whether or not the behavior is problematic for the parent. The current study focuses on the intensity scale, which has demonstrated loftier internal consistency (α=.95) and construct validity for children and adolescents (Eyberg & Pincus, 1999). Scores are presented equally T-scores (M=50, SD=ten), with higher scores indicating higher frequency behavior problems. Internal consistency in the current sample was high (α=.93).

2.3.four. Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC)

The PSOC (Johnston & Mash, 1989) is a 16-detail self-study measure of the parent's sense of parenting efficacy and satisfaction. The items in the PSOC are answered on a six-point scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". The scale assesses ii factors: Satisfaction, or extent to which the individual enjoys the parenting role and parenting frustration and anxiety; and Efficacy, or perceived competence, problem solving power, and adequacy. Higher scores indicate college feelings of satisfaction or efficacy. The measure out has demonstrated adequate internal consistency scores for both the Efficacy (α=.76) and Satisfaction (α=.75) scales as well as adequate validity (Johnston & Mash, 1989). Internal consistency in the electric current sample was acceptable for both the Efficacy scale (α=.71) and the Satisfaction calibration (α=.76).

2.3.5. Parenting Stress Index, 4th edition, short form (PSI-iv-SF)

The PSI-four-SF (Abidin, 2012) is a 36-detail, abbreviated inventory evaluating the magnitude of stress in the parent-child system. The PSI-4-SF is made up of three domains, including Parental Distress (PD), Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (PCDI), and Difficult Child (DC). Scores are presented every bit T-scores (M=l, SD=10), with higher scores reflecting greater levels of stress. The PSI-four-SF has demonstrated adequate internal consistency for all iii scales (PD α=.90; PCDI α=.89; DC α=.88) and validity (Abidin, 2012). Internal consistency in the current sample was high for all 3 scales (PD α=.90; PCDI α=.87; DC α=.83).

2.4. Information Analyses

Data were entered into SPSS and manually rechecked. The main aim of the current study was to document the self-care experiences of families raising children with FASD and examine the inter-relations between cocky-intendance and indices of child and family operation. As a issue, analyses were descriptive in nature. Correlational analyses examined associations between self-care confidence and frequency and measures of child and family unit functioning. Self-care strategies and obstacles were examined and categories to provide boosted clarification of common strategies and obstacles faced by families.

Cocky-care strategies and obstacles were categorized based on primal words and themes that emerged throughout the process of coding. Two independent raters aggregated each participant'south responses based on like or identical responses of key words together. Grouping of responses yielded contained categories for both self-care strategies and common obstacles.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptives of Sample

Descriptives are presented in Table 2. All variables approximated a normal distribution (skew values ranged from −0.84–0.99; kurtosis values ranged from −0.79–2.22). Parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child-related stress are presented as T scores with a hateful of fifty and SD of 10. Means and standard deviations for parental satisfaction and parental efficacy are more often than not in line with normative information (Johnston & Mash, 1989). A T score on the ECBI to a higher place lx is considered clinically pregnant (Eyberg & Pincus, 1999), indicating the electric current sample showed elevated problem beliefs scores on average. On the PSI, a T score from 60–62 indicates high stress and a score of 63 or above indicates clinically significant levels of stress. On average, the electric current sample showed high levels of stress on the difficult child-related stress subscale of the PSI.

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for study variables.

Measure	Mean	SD	Range
SCA: Confidence in Cocky-Intendance Abilities	3.5	.96	i–5
SCA: Frequency of Self-Care	5.0	two.0	1–8
PSOC: Parenting Satisfaction	35.37	six.74	22–51
PSOC: Parental Efficacy	20.74	5.27	9–33
PSI-4: Parental Distress	51.46	ten.25	34–79
PSI-4: Parent Kid Dysfunctional Interaction	55.59	12.04	eighteen–76
PSI-4: Difficult Kid-R elated Stress	62.17	11.61	35–84
Family unit Needs Met	two.80	.71	1.15–4
ECBI: Intensity Kid Problem Beliefs	66.96	nine.lxx	47–xc

3.2. Correlational Analyses

Pearson'due south correlation coefficients were computed to investigate the relationships between confidence in and frequency of self-care and measures of child and family functioning. Correlational results are shown in Tabular array 3. Caregivers with greater confidence in cocky-care abilities were significantly more likely to report higher satisfaction in parenting, lower parental distress, and more family needs being met. They were as well more than likely to report lower difficult kid-related stress, an association which approached significance (p=.07). Caregiver ratings of abilities and confidence were significantly correlated with caregiver report of how often they engaged in self-care; nevertheless, caregiver report of how often they engaged in self-care was non significantly correlated with whatever other measure. Caregiver ratings of abilities and confidence were not significantly correlated with caregiver ratings of child beliefs, perceived parenting efficacy, or parent-child dysfunctional interaction. Neither caregiver ratings of abilities and conviction nor caregiver ratings of frequency of self-care were significantly correlated with child age or gross family household income. Additionally, parental office satisfaction was negatively correlated with all subscales on the PSI (parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child-related stress), and child problem behavior. The clan betwixt parental distress approached significance criterion with kid beliefs problems (p=.07), with higher trouble behaviors relating to college parent stress.

Tabular array three.

Correlation tabular array for relevant written report variables.

	ii	3	4	five	vi	7	viii	9	10	11
i. Conviction in Self-Care Abilities	.36**	.35**	−.18	−.33*	−.21	−.27	.48**	−.20	−.08	−.16
ii. Frequency of Cocky-Care	--	.04	−.29	.01	−.09	.08	.12	−.04	.06	−.24
iii. Parenting Satisfaction		--	−.24	−.63**	−.48**	−.58**	.45**	−.48**	−.31*	.x
iv. Parental Efficacy			--	.23	.08	.06	−.42**	−.08	−.09	.54**
5. Parental Distress				--	.53**	.58**	−.42**	.27	.eighteen	−.09
six. Parent Child Dysfunctional Interaction					--	.62**	−.45**	.lx**	.24	−.21
7. Difficult Child-Related Stress						--	−.37	.74**	.30*	−.17
8. Family Needs Met							--	−.26	−.18	−.08
ix. Child Problem Behavior								--	.32*	−.xviii
10. Kid Age									--	.07
11. Family Income										--

3.3. Cocky-Care Strategies and Obstacles

Self-care strategies vicious into 7 overarching categories which were: being nowadays, seeking social back up, maintaining concrete health, engaging in hobbies, consuming media, treating oneself to minor luxuries, and seeking information. These categories and instance responses are presented in Table 4.

Tabular array four.

Categories and definitions for caregivers' strategies for self-care. Caregivers could list up to 5 self-care strategies. The number of parents who reported using at least one strategy in the relevant category are listed beneath category names.

Code	Description	Case
Being Present (34 caregivers, 73.9%)	Parent references an activity focused on quiet time, time alone, or time in nature. Included in this category was spirituality and religious activities.	• Meditation • Yoga • Spending fourth dimension in nature • "Me fourth dimension" • Prayer
Maintaining Physical Health (31 caregivers, 67.four%)	Parent references beingness agile or healthy eating, or other method of maintaining health.	• Practice • Take walk • Sleep • Consume healthier
Seeking Social Support (25 caregivers, 54.3%)	Parent references spending time with or talking to loved ones, or reaching out for professional person or specialized support.	• Spend time with friends • Spend fourth dimension with partner • Go to a support grouping • Talk to a advisor
Engaging in Hobbies (eighteen caregivers, 39.one%)	Parent references participating in a hobby or favored action.	• Read quietly • Gardening • Cooking
Treating Oneself to Small Luxuries (xiii caregivers, 28.3%)	Parent references a small luxury or indulgence.	• Get pedicures • Have a bath • Eat chocolate
Consuming Media (nine caregivers, xix.6%)	Parent references music, movies, or other media.	• Sentry TV • Relax with movie • Music
Seeking Information (3 caregivers, half dozen.5%)	Parent references educating self or researching solutions.	• Research • Internet – seminars

Mutual obstacles fell into viii categories, which were time restraints, lack of resources, family needs and challenges, exhaustion, health issues, mood, logistics, and pride. These are shown in Tabular array 5.

Table five.

Categories and definitions for caregivers' perceived obstacles to self-intendance. Caregivers could list up to v obstacles. The number of parents who reported facing at least 1 obstacle in the relevant category are listed below category names.

Lawmaking	Description	Example
Time Restraints (34 caregivers, 73.9%)	Parent references lack of fourth dimension or busy schedule.	• Non enough time in a day • Running out of time • Too much housework
Lack of Resources (26 caregivers, 56.5%)	Parent references a lack of resources such every bit financial resources, support from family, or child care.	• Coin and costs • Lack of back up from family unit • Child intendance
Family Needs and Challenges (26 caregivers, 56.v%)	Parent references the thought that children'due south or partner's needs come first, or difficulties associated with behavior of children.	• Children and family needs come first • Behavior of children • Constant supervision
Exhaustion (14 caregivers, 30.iv%)	Parent references fatigue or exhaustion.	• Too exhausted • Tired
Wellness Issues (six caregivers, 13.0%)	Parent references medical issues.	• Medical problems • Physical health limitations
Mood (5 caregivers, 10.nine%)	Parent references stress or a lack of motivation.	• Work stress • Mood
Logistics (4 caregivers, 8.vii%)	Parent references logistics of strategies for self-care.	• Alive far away • Friends not available
Pride (i parent, 2.2%)	Parent mentions pride.	• Pride

iv. Give-and-take

4.1. Significance of Results

Caregivers of children with FASD face increased stress related to parenting (east.thou., Paley et al., 2005; Webster et al., 2008); therefore, it is imperative that research focus on how caregiver cocky-intendance may be used equally a method to alleviate parenting stress amid this population. Cocky-care strategies have not been previously investigated in FASD. Results from the current written report show that caregivers who reported higher conviction in their ability to apply cocky-care also had college family needs being met, higher satisfaction in the parenting function, and lower parental distress. These relationships were non seen with regard to frequency of cocky-care. Neither confidence in self-care abilities nor frequency of cocky-care was related to caregiver ratings of child problem beliefs, parenting self-efficacy, child age, or gross family household income.

Caregivers with higher confidence in cocky-care had higher family needs met, lower parental distress, and higher satisfaction in the parenting function. Information technology is non surprising that college family needs met correlated with college confidence in cocky-care, equally many parents cited lack of resources as an obstacle to self-care. Family needs, including respite and sufficient services, are essential to families' well-beingness (Olson et al., 2009). Unfortunately, many caregivers raising children with FASD take difficulty accessing these types of services (Petrenko et al., 2014; Petrenko et al., 2019; Ryan, Bonnett, & Gass, 2006). Helping families find creative solutions to meet these needs may reduce caregiver brunt and have important benefits on self-care confidence. Additionally, college confidence in self-intendance was associated with decreased parental distress and increased parental satisfaction. This study was correlational in nature and tin can't infer directionality. It is possible self-intendance employ and confidence led to caregivers feeling less distress and more satisfaction; alternately, less distressed families may have fewer self-intendance needs. Time to come research investigating a directional relationship between these variables could have implications for intervention targets.

Several themes were repeated throughout the caregivers' descriptions of their self-care strategies, including existence nowadays, seeking social support, maintaining physical health, engaging in hobbies, consuming media, treating oneself to pocket-sized luxuries, and seeking data. These strategies line up with current literature on protective factors for caregiver stress and negative outcomes. For instance, mothers of children with developmental disabilities reported poorer physical health than mothers of typically developing children (Eisenhower, Baker, & Blacher, 2009). Additionally, social support has been shown to exist important for parents and caregivers of children with developmental disabilities, especially mothers (Jones & Passey, 2005; Institute & Sanders, 2007). Giallo, Rose, & Vittorino (2011) plant mothers of children with ASD evidenced loftier need for social support, low slumber quality, and low physical wellness predictive of maternal fatigue. These factors were in turn predictive of stress, anxiety, and low in these mothers. More than research is needed to further illuminate the relationship between caregivers' self-intendance strategies and their needs as parents.

Similarly, themes emerged among obstacles to cocky-care reported past caregivers, including fourth dimension constraints, lack of resources, family needs and challenges, burnout, health bug, mood, logistics, and pride. Herman and Thompson (1995) establish that families of children with developmental disabilities perceived their basic resources every bit adequate, but felt they lacked the fourth dimension, financial resources, and child-care to fully intendance for their children. In fact, they found that parents' perception of time resources was the strongest predictor of low. Perception of time resources was associated with corporeality of care needed for the kid, adequacy of fiscal resources, and child-care (Herman & Marcenko, 1995). Our findings replicate those perceived barriers and contribute more data on caregivers' perceived obstacles. Lack of time was by far the most mutual obstacle reported, with lack of financial resources also frequent. Many parents besides noted that not having child-care, particularly child-care that is equipped to handle the needs of their children, was an obstruction to self-intendance. Low sensation of FASD and stigma often prevent these needs from being met (Petrenko et al., 2014). Other common obstacles included lack of support, with caregivers noting lack of social support broadly as well as lack of support from close family members and spouses. Olson and colleagues (2009) reported that an imperative need of caregivers of children with FASD was to be able to connect with others who understood their feel. Support and reassurance in hard situations was likewise a mutual need for these caregivers (Olson et al., 2009).

The lack of relationship between the frequency of self-care and parental stress and role satisfaction may indicate that caregivers' perceptions of their self-care abilities, and non necessarily actual self-care behavior, may exist more important for their well-being. This is consistent with studies that have institute that parents' cognitive appraisal of the state of affairs may be more relevant to their mental wellness than specific coping strategies (Higgins, Bailey, & Pearce, 2005; Hassall et al., 2005). This idea is of import given the strain on resource, peculiarly time, experienced by caregivers of children with disabilities (Herman & Thompson, 1995; Herman & Marcenko, 1997), which was likewise seen in caregivers' perceived obstacles to self-intendance in this study. Therefore, targeting caregivers' perceptions and attitudes about self-care may be more of import than frequency per se. This finding has important implications for effective stress interventions, discussed below.

Information technology is notable in the electric current study that kid problem beliefs did non correlate with indices of self-care. Given the electric current literature on the transactional human relationship betwixt child trouble behavior and parent stress (Baker et al., 2003), this finding suggests that although stress may be affected by kid problem behavior, confidence in caring for oneself is non. However, it is important to note that the majority of children in the current sample evidenced clinically elevated behavior problems, and also that the sample size of the study was relatively minor. Mayhap this pattern of findings would be dissimilar in a sample with more than variable behavior and a larger sample size.

This study also replicated additional relationships documented in the literature on parent wellbeing. For example, parents of children with intellectual disabilities who were more than stressed, especially as related to their caregiving responsibilities, tended to take lower parental role satisfaction (Hassall et al., 2005). We establish a negative association between satisfaction and child problem beliefs, also reflected in the literature on parents of typical children (Johnston & Brew, 1989; Gilmore & Cuskelly, 2012). Current research suggests a transactional human relationship between parent stress and child problem behavior, in which parental stress contributes to child beliefs problems, which in plough increases parental stress (Baker et al., 2003; Jirikowic, Olson, & Astley, 2012; Paley et al., 2005). We constitute a marginally significant positive human relationship between stress and child problem beliefs in this sample.

4.2. Implications for Intervention

Self-care strategies reported give insight into existing stress-reduction interventions that may exist especially effective in parents and caregivers of children with FASD. Themes found in the current report, especially being nowadays, reflect principles of mindfulness such as spending time alone and reflection. Mindfulness-based interventions for parent stress reduction have recently shown promise (Neece, 2014; Bazzano et al., 2015), and could be reasonable approaches to exam with this population. Notably, a recent feasibility study in parents of children with FASD found positive results for the Parents under Pressure programme, an intervention aimed at increasing self-regulation and improving the parent-child relationship through mindfulness-based strategies (Reid et al., 2017). This lends farther back up to the promise of mindfulness-based intervention in this population, not just for stress-reduction but besides self-regulation and the parent-child relationship. Caregivers who seek individual psychotherapy may also consider pursuing providers who use mindfulness-based approaches in their exercise.

Results of the current study support the use of existing psychological interventions in caregivers of children with FASD. For instance, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may be especially effective in this population given findings regarding caregivers' self-care strategies and obstacles. Deed emphasizes acceptance of difficult or unpleasant emotions and a focus on personal values and goals (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999). Promising results for ACT have been found in parents of children with autism and cognitive palsy (Blackledge & Hayes, 2006; Whittingham, Sanders, McKinlay, & Boyd, 2013). Interventions to subtract caregivers' stress and increase their mental wellness have important implications for their quality of life. Results from the current study suggest that parental distress plays an vital role in caregiver cocky-care and wellbeing. Poorer caregiver mental health has besides been associated with lower caregiver and family unit quality of life (Reid & Moritz, 2019).

Caregivers also reported using physical activity for cocky-care. Observational studies accept shown a strong link between concrete activity and reduced stress (Aldana, Sutton, Jacobson, & Quirk, 1996; Hansmann et al., 2007). While some interventions accept used yoga or other forms of movement for stress reduction in the general population (Michalsen et al., 2005; Granath, Ingvarsson, von Thiele, & Lundberg, 2006; Smith et al., 2008; Berger & Owen, 1988), these interventions could as well exist studied in parents of children with disabilities. Social support was also a common strategy for self-intendance in caregivers, and lack of social and family unit support was reported equally an obstruction to cocky-intendance. While a strong social network has been associated with reduced stress (Jones & Passey, 2005; Found & Sanders, 2007), caregivers raising children with FASD oft written report feeling isolated and have difficulty finding support (Petrenko et al., 2019). Future interventions could piece of work to strengthen social networks of parents and caregivers in this population.

Results of this study propose that targeting perceived confidence in cocky-care abilities may be more helpful than emphasizing frequency of activities. The cerebral nature of the associations constitute in this study may suggest the relevance of cognitive behavioral methods to target attitudes around self-care. This has been reflected in current enquiry on parents of children with developmental disabilities (Vocaliser et al., 2007; Lindo et al., 2016) and should go along to exist utilized in and tailored to this population. In add-on, every bit reflected in the identified obstacles, participants reported the idea that family needs were more than important than their own needs. This suggests that motivational interviewing (Millner & Rollnick, 1991) may be of import to consider for this population. Caregivers may need assistance to consider how cocky-care aligns with their family unit goals and values besides as support in behavior change.

This descriptive written report also provides documentation of cocky-care practices and obstacles that may be useful for clinicians developing and implementing interventions with families. Strategies for self-intendance vary widely from person to person; what works well for one person may not work well at all for another. Clinicians should go along in mind the variability of methods of self-care when working with parents and caregivers of children with developmental disabilities. Additionally, the obstacles detailed in this study should inform intervention work with this population. FASD is a lifelong condition and many parents will have extended caregiving roles throughout the child's life. Thus, it is imperative that stress reduction intervention be sustainable, which means being able to accost the difficulties families face up in being able to utilize self-care in the long-term. Clinicians should consider obstacles families may run into in self-care and work with them to accost these issues in a realistic style.

four.3. Strengths and Limitations

Self-care is ofttimes emphasized past clinicians working with families and in self-assist materials, simply almost no formal research has been conducted on the cocky-care practices of caregivers raising children with FASD and how this relates to child and family performance. This descriptive report documents important information about self-care in this population that can help guide subsequent inquiry and intervention development.

This written report is limited by its cross-sectional design; thus, no conclusions on causality or longitudinal transactions betwixt constructs of involvement can be made. Future studies using longitudinal designs could assess whether self-care can lead to a significant reduction in stress. Farther, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention targeting cocky-care could add additional advantages. Because these designs can more effectively assess causality than can cross-sectional designs, clearer conclusions could exist made with regard to the relationship of self-care and stress in caregivers (Toth, Petrenko, Gravener-Davis, & Handley, 2016). Specifically, future research should assess whether a transactional human relationship exists between self-care and stress. To get an even more clear assessment of the relationship between cocky-care and stress, ecological momentary assessment diary assay would be useful in pinpointing the exact causes, effects, and fluctuations of these constructs.

The findings of this study should be considered in the context of the sample recruited. Findings should be cautiously considered every bit the sample size was relatively modest. The sample was made up of caregivers of preschool and school-aged children, and their experiences may differ essentially from caregivers of infants or adolescents. The sample was besides drawn from an intervention study, meaning the participants may differ from non-treatment seeking populations. Additionally, biological parents of children with FASD are underrepresented in this sample, as are fathers; these populations may approach self-care differently. Although a wide range was included, our sample consisted mostly of middle-class participants with some college education or greater, which may further limit the generalizability of the results.

Finally, the possibility of an unknown variable driving the associations found in this study should be considered. Confidence in self-care, satisfaction in parenting, and parental stress could all be affected by a variable non measured in this written report, such equally global cognitive style. Farther inquiry should investigate the possibility of a more full general factor affecting these constructs. It is also possible that the self-care frequency variable was non sensitive to caregivers' self-intendance behavior.

5. Conclusions

This study provides of import data nearly self-intendance in caregivers and its associations with other family functioning variables including stress and parental satisfaction. Although stress-reduction in caregivers of children with developmental disabilities has been discussed in the literature, piddling enquiry has been done on how these caregivers engage in self-care. This study investigated strategies and obstacles relating to self-care, as well as how confident caregivers felt in self-intendance and how frequently they engaged in it. The findings of this descriptive written report hold important implications for clinicians working with families of children with FASD. Interventions targeting stress reduction in this population should keep in mind the obstacles faced by caregivers as well equally the highly varied strategies they utilize. Hereafter inquiry should investigate a causal or transactional relationship betwixt caregiver self-care, parental stress, and parental satisfaction.

​

Highlights

• Caregivers of children with FASD reported varied self-care strategies.

• Cocky-care conviction related to parenting satisfaction, distress, and needs met.

• Cocky-intendance frequency related to perceived confidence, but not other outcomes.

• Limited time, resources, and social back up were common obstacles to self-care.

What this paper adds

This paper is the starting time to describe caregivers' strategies for self-intendance and the obstacles they face in this area. Caregivers' strategies, while varied, were grouped into categories which tin can inform clinical work with parents of children with FASD. Additionally, this paper contributes to our understanding of the obstacles and barriers these caregivers face in raising their children and caring for themselves. This paper emphasizes the importance of confidence in self-care, especially with regard to stress and parenting satisfaction.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded past a grant (K01AA020486) from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or the National Institutes of Wellness. We gratefully acknowledge the undergraduate, postal service-bachelor, and graduate educatee research assistants who were involved in participant recruitment and data collection for this study. Near importantly, we give thanks the courageous and dedicated caregivers, and their children, who participated in this study and without whom these research advances would not be possible.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number K01 AA020486, 2011–2016].

Footnotes

Declarations of interest: none

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Every bit a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its terminal form. Please annotation that during the product process errors may be discovered which could bear upon the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

• Abidin RR (1992). The determinants of parenting behavior. Journal of clinical child psychology, 21(4), 407–412. [Google Scholar]
• Abidin RR (2012). Parenting stress index, (PSI-four). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. [Google Scholar]
• Aldana SG, Sutton LD, Jacobson BH, & Quirk MG (1996). Relationships between leisure time physical activeness and perceived stress. Perceptual and Motor skills, 82(ane), 315–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Armstrong MI, Birnie-Lefcovitch S, & Ungar MT (2005). Pathways betwixt social support, family well being, quality of parenting, and kid resilience: What we know. Periodical of child and family studies, 14(2), 269–281. [Google Scholar]
• Bakery BL, McIntyre LL, Blacher J, Crnic M, Edelbrock C, & Low C (2003). Pre-school children with and without developmental delay: behaviour problems and parenting stress over time. Journal of Intellectual Inability Research, 47(4 5), 217–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Bazzano A, Wolfe C, Zylowska L, Wang S, Schuster Eastward, Barrett C, & Lehrer D (2015). Mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) for parents and caregivers of individuals with developmental disabilities: A community-based arroyo. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(two), 298–308. [Google Scholar]
• Beresford BA (1994). Resource and strategies: How parents cope with the care of a disabled child. Periodical of child psychology and psychiatry, 35(1), 171–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Berger BG, & Owen DR (1988). Stress reduction and mood enhancement in 4 exercise modes: Swimming, body conditioning, hatha yoga, and fencing. Enquiry quarterly for exercise and sport, 59(two), 148–159. [Google Scholar]
• Blackledge JT, & Hayes SC (2006). Using acceptance and commitment training in the support of parents of children diagnosed with autism. Child & Family unit Behavior Therapy, 28(1), one–18. [Google Scholar]
• Bobbitt SA, Baugh LA, Andrew GH, Melt JL, Dark-green CR, Pei JR, & Rasmussen CR (2016). Caregiver needs and stress in caring for individuals with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Research in developmental disabilities, 55, 100–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Brownish JD, Rodger S, George N, St Arnault D, & Sintzel J (2008). Rewards of parenting a child with a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. The Open Family Studies Journal, 1, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
• Conger RD, Patterson GR, & Ge Ten (1995). It takes two to replicate: A mediational model for the touch of parents' stress on adolescent aligning. Child development, 66(1), 80–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Creasey GL, & Jarvis PA (1994). Relationships between parenting stress and developmental functioning amongst ii-year-olds. Babe Beliefs and Development, 17(iv), 423–429. [Google Scholar]
• Dumas JE, Wolf LC, Fisman SN, & Culligan A (1991). Parenting stress, child behavior issues, and dysphoria in parents of children with autism, Downwards syndrome, behavior disorders, and normal development. Exceptionality: A Special Educational activity Journal, 2(two), 97–110. [Google Scholar]
• Eisenhower AS, Baker BL, & Blacher J (2009). Children's delayed development and behavior bug: Impact on mothers' perceived concrete health across early childhood. Social Scientific discipline & Medicine, 68(1), 89–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Estes A, Munson J, Dawson G, Koehler E, Zhou XH, & Abbott R (2009). Parenting stress and psychological functioning amidst mothers of preschool children with autism and developmental delay. Autism, thirteen(4), 375–387. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Eyberg SM, & Pincus D (1999). Eyberg child behaviour inventory and sutter-eyberg student behaviour inventory–Revised: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resource. [Google Scholar]
• Giallo R, Rose N, & Vittorino R (2011). Fatigue, wellbeing and parenting in mothers of infants and toddlers with slumber bug. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 29(3), 236–249. [Google Scholar]
• Gilmore L, & Cuskelly M (2012). Parenting satisfaction and cocky-efficacy: A longitudinal study of mothers of children with Down syndrome. Journal of Family Studies, xviii(1), 28–35. [Google Scholar]
• Granath J, Ingvarsson S, von Thiele U, & Lundberg U (2006). Stress management: a randomized study of cognitive behavioural therapy and yoga. Cognitive behaviour therapy, 35(1), three–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hansmann R, Hug SM, & Seeland One thousand (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban forestry & urban greening, 6(4), 213225. [Google Scholar]
• Hassall R, Rose J, & McDonald J (2005). Parenting stress in mothers of children with an intellectual inability: The furnishings of parental cognitions in relation to kid characteristics and family back up. Journal of intellectual disability inquiry, 49(six), 405–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hastings RP, & Beck A (2004). Practitioner review: Stress intervention for parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 45(8), 1338–1349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hastings RP, Kovshoff H, Chocolate-brown T, Ward NJ, Espinosa FD, & Remington B (2005). Coping strategies in mothers and fathers of preschool and schoolhouse-historic period children with autism. Autism, 9(4), 377–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hayes SC, Strosahl K, & Wilson KG (1999). Credence and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Alter. New York: Guilford Printing. [Google Scholar]
• Heaman DJ (1995). Perceived stressors and coping strategies of parents who have children with developmental disabilities: a comparison of mothers with fathers. Periodical of Pediatric Nursing, 10(5), 311–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Herman SE, & Marcenko MO (1997). Perceptions of services and resources as mediators of low among parents of children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 35(half-dozen), 458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Herman SE, & Thompson L (1995). Families' perceptions of their resource for caring for children with developmental disabilities. Mental retardation, 33(2), 73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Higgins DJ, Bailey SR, & Pearce JC (2005). Factors associated with functioning style and coping strategies of families with a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 9(2), 125–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hill C, & Rose J (2009). Parenting stress in mothers of adults with an intellectual inability: Parental cognitions in relation to child characteristics and family support. Periodical of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(12), 969–980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hoyme HE, Kalberg WO, Elliott AJ, Blankenship J, Buckley D, Marais AS, … & Jewett T (2016). Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosing fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 138(ii), e20154256. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Jirikowic T, Olson HC, & Astley S (2012). Parenting stress and sensory processing: Children with fetal booze spectrum disorders. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Wellness, 32(iv), 160–168. [Google Scholar]
• Johnston C, & Mash EJ (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of clinical child psychology, 18(2), 167–175. [Google Scholar]
• Jones K, & Smith D (1973). Recognition of the fetal alcohol syndrome in early infancy. The Lancet, 302(7836), 999–1001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Kreutzer JS, Marwitz J, & W D (1988). Family needs questionnaire. Richmond, VA: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Severe Traumatic Encephalon Injury, Medical Higher of Virginia. [Google Scholar]
• Lindo EJ, Kliemann KR, Combes BH, & Frank J (2016). Managing stress levels of parents of children with developmental disabilities: A meta analytic review of interventions. Family Relations, 65(i), 207–224. [Google Scholar]
• May PA, Chambers CD, Kalberg WO, Zellner J, Feldman H, Buckley D, … & Taras H (2018). Prevalence of fetal booze spectrum disorders in 4 US communities. Jama, 319(five), 474–482. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• McBride BA (1989). Stress and fathers' parental competence: Implications for family life and parent educators. Family Relations, 385–389. [Google Scholar]
• Michalsen A, Grossman P, Acil A, Langhorst J, Lüdtke R, Esch T, … & Dobos G (2005). Rapid stress reduction and anxiolysis among distressed women as a result of a three-calendar month intensive yoga program. Medical Science Monitor, 11(12), CR555–CR561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Millner WR, & Rollnick S (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to modify addictive behaviors.
• Myers HF, & Taylor S (1998). Family contributions to gamble and resilience in African American children. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 215–229. [Google Scholar]
• Neece CL (2014). Mindfulness based stress reduction for parents of young children with developmental delays: Implications for parental mental health and child beliefs issues. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(ii), 174–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ngai FW, & Chan SWC (2012). Stress, maternal role competence, and satisfaction among Chinese women in the perinatal period. Enquiry in Nursing & Health, 35(1), thirty–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Olson HC, Oti R, Gelo J, & Beck S (2009). "Family unit matters:" fetal booze spectrum disorders and the family unit. Developmental Disabilities Inquiry Reviews, 15(3), 235249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Paley B, O'Connor MJ, Frankel F, & Marquardt R (2006). Predictors of stress in parents of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Periodical of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(five), 396–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Paley B, O'Connor MJ, Kogan N, & Findlay R (2005). Prenatal alcohol exposure, kid externalizing behavior, and maternal stress. Parenting: Science and Practice, five(1), 2956. [Google Scholar]
• Petrenko CL, Alto ME, Hart AR, Freeze SM, & Cole LL (2019). "I'm Doing My Part, I But Need Help From the Community": Intervention Implications of Foster and Adoptive Parents' Experiences Raising Children and Young Adults With FASD. Journal of Family unit Nursing. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Petrenko CL, Tahir N, Mahoney EC, & Mentum NP (2014). Prevention of secondary conditions in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: identification of systems-level barriers. Maternal and child wellness journal, 18(6), 1496–1505. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Establish KM, & Sanders MR (2007). Predictors of care giver stress in families of preschool-aged children with developmental disabilities. Periodical of intellectual disability inquiry, 51(2), 109–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Reid N, Dawe South, Harnett P, Shelton D, Hutton L, & O'Callaghan F (2017). Feasibility written report of a family-focused intervention to ameliorate outcomes for children with FASD. Research in developmental disabilities, 67, 34–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Reid North, & Moritz KM (2019). Caregiver and family unit quality of life for children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Research in developmental disabilities, 94, 103478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Renner LM, Whitney SD, & Easton SD (2015). Profiles of self-reported parenting competence and stress among women with/without histories of babyhood sexual abuse. Journal of Kid and Family unit Studies, 24(3), 749–761. [Google Scholar]
• Ryan DM, Bonnett DM, & Gass CB (2006). Sobering thoughts: Town hall meetings on fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. American Journal of Public Health, 96(12), 20982101. [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Vocalist GH, Ethridge BL, & Aldana SI (2007). Chief and secondary effects of parenting and stress direction interventions for parents of children with developmental disabilities: A meta assay. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 13(four), 357–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Smith BW, Shelley BM, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, & Bernard J (2008). A pilot study comparing the effects of mindfulness-based and cognitive-behavioral stress reduction. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, xiv(3), 251–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Smith TB, Oliver MN, & Innocenti MS (2001). Parenting stress in families of children with disabilities. American periodical of orthopsychiatry, 71(2), 257–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Streissguth AP, Bookstein FL, Barr HM, Sampson PD, O'Malley K, & Young JK (2004). Gamble factors for agin life outcomes in fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal booze effects. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25(four), 228–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Toth SL, Petrenko CL, Gravener Davis JA, & Handley ED (2016). Advances in prevention science: A developmental psychopathology perspective. Developmental psychopathology, 1–59. [Google Scholar]
• Warren KR, Hewitt BG, & Thomas JD (2011). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: research challenges and opportunities. Booze Research & Health, 34(1), 4. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Watson SL, Coons KD, & Hayes SA (2013). Autism spectrum disorder and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Part I: A comparing of parenting stress. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 38(2), 95–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Watson SL, Hayes SA, Coons KD, & Radford-Paz Due east (2013). Autism spectrum disorder and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Part II: A qualitative comparison of parenting stress. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 38(2), 105–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Webster RI, Majnemer A, Platt RW, & Shevell MI (2008). Child wellness and parental stress in school-age children with a preschool diagnosis of developmental delay. Journal of kid neurology, 23(1), 32–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Whittingham K, Sanders M, McKinlay Fifty, & Boyd RN (2013). Stepping Stones Triple P and Credence and Commitment Therapy for parents of children with cognitive palsy: trial protocol. Brain Impairment, 14(2), 270–280. [Google Scholar]

camachoculton.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392794/